will people stop paying income tax

The CLS Talks Feedback Special 3 ... The CLS Talks/Feedback Special 3:  https://youtu.be/uF9tbDRx8GY Will People Ever Stop Paying Income Tax?  ... and more questions from The CLS Talks ... feedbacks Feedback Special 3 ... from The CLS   Hi Folks ...   The CLS Talks "Feedback Special" No. 3 is now available here: https://youtu.be/uF9tbDRx8GY       FEEL FREE TO LISTEN and SHARE THE LINK WITH ALL   ~~~   MORE STUFF BELOW ...         HOW TO CREATE A KILLER CROSS EXAMINATION   Most People that have attended Schools and Tutorials, have expressed an overwhelming interest in the process of what happens in a Court, how to handle what goes on, and how to put together a Cross-Examination.    By attending the or any Court as "an observer", you will get good a handle on what People do NOT do, and how badly any purported witnesses for the prosecution/accusers are Cross-Examined by the Accused/Defendants or their purported Solicitors.   Whilst critically Cross-Examining a witness, is on the face of it a very difficult thing to do, it is only a matter of repeating a simple process, observing a few guidelines, and learning how to avoid any curve-balls that a Judge, Barrister, Solicitor or Prosecutor may throw at you.    When you get into the nuts and bolts of it, you can learn how to tear any witness apart, piece by piece, and that includes members of An Garda Siochana, who/m from our feedback and experience, know little or nothing about the law anyhow.  In fact, to date, we have not ever come across any witness that knows the law sufficiently well (or at all), and/or cannot be legally decimated in Court.   There are only three simple steps … 1.  Framing your questions.  2. Getting the answers you want, and 3. Bringing the Court to the desired conclusion or outcome.  You start leaning this process in reverse Order.  In other words; knowing or establishing your desired conclusion or outcome.              The next planned set of Tutorials will be a Court Room Scenario, whereby a Cross-Examination will be created and built from the ground up by the attendees. We will have one or possibly two case studies to look at, one being a "Minor Criminal Case" and/or a "Civil Matter".   The Tutorial group will agree, who will act as the Creditor, Accuser or Plaintiff, and who/m the Debtor, Accused or Defendant will be represented by.  There will be an acting Judge, Prosecutor, Solicitor and/or Barrister present.   The Debtor, Accused or Defendant will be guided by the Tutorial group, and the facilitators on what to seek, and on how to put together the Cross Examination questions amongst other things.   A full on Cross-Examination will take place … with all the usual shenanigans of the Legal Professions and Judiciary thrown in for good measure.   The aim will be, to give People a clear idea on how to put together an effective Cross-Examination and how to execute same, whilst dealing with any potential pit falls that may be put in the way.  For example, if the Judge threatens you with Contempt of Court, how do you handle this?   These Tutorials will be based upon REAL CASES, after which, the class will be updated on the progress the REAL CASE(S) have made, albeit they may have ended, or they may still be in motion.   Carrying out a Cross-Examination is perhaps one of the toughest things to do in a Court, yet it requires you to know but a few basic principles. Cross-Examinations in most cases can be pre-prepared, and pre-scripted.    In preparing and pre-scripting a great or killer Cross-Examination, you will know precisely what you are going to ask the witness, and will be fully prepared for the answers they give.  In other words, you will know what they will answer, and only then you can bring them to the point that you are making, albeit you are discrediting them as a witness, or they are working in your favour.   When you get, the process or method of Cross-Examination finely tuned, and working, there are very few if any witnesses, whose testimonies cannot be destroyed, undone or can be made to work against your accuser.    Most witnesses are ignorant of the LAW, or are just simply mindlessly stating stuff that they have parroted many times before. It works for them, because they have seldom if ever been CRITICALLY Cross-Examined before.   The two biggest challenges in carrying out a robust Cross-Examination are a) Your preparation and pre-scripting, and b) the Judge.   In most cases the Solicitor or the Barrister for the prosecution will not be expecting, and will be ill-prepared for "their witness(es)" to be Cross-Examined in critical fashion.    It will be a shock to them when this process begins, so they seldom say much in objection or in defense of their witness(es).    The biggest objector to your Cross-Examination will be the Judge.  In most cases they will see what is happening fairly early on, and will do as much as possible to trip you up, especially if you are making good ground.  This issue will be covered and tackled at the Tutorials.   More info. and booking details >HERE<.  The CLS Talks: FEEDBACK SPECIAL Part 2 >HERE<     KILLER CROSS EXAMINATION. BOOK >HERE<       Get on our mailing list: www.TheCommonLawSociety.com/

JoePlummer.com News 06-27-2016

Making progress, folks!

Chapters 1 and 2 are complete (posted at the link below), and chapter 3 will be posted within a few days. If just HALF of the people on this list kicked in $5, we'd get this project done in a couple months! Don't underestimate small donations; they add up and they're much appreciated!

See progress at:
http://joeplummer.com/tragedia-y-la-esperanza-101-1.html

Donate at:
https://www.gofundme.com/27xafpqv

StopTheLie.com News update 06-27-2016

Joe Plummer on Dishonest Money and the New World Order (Audio)
Source: JoePlummer.com
Here is a recent interview I did regarding our fraudulent monetary system. If you're interested, you can read the book for free at my website. 
Listen to audio at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaT4R8MR144

======================================================

Brexit Referendum Is Non-Binding. UK Parliament Not Voters has Final Say
Source: GlobalResearch.ca
Various options exist, including supporting Thursday's outcome, ignoring it, or "re-negotiating another deal and put(ting) that to another referendum" – repeating the process "until voters eventually vote the 'right' way," what's best for monied interests, not them.
Read full article at: http://www.globalresearch.ca/brexit-referendum-is-non-binding-uk-parliament-not-voter-has-final-say/5532485

COMMENT: Brexit: Assuming it actually happens, I'm really not sure how the NWO can spin this to their advantage. There's probably an angle somewhere, but other than creating total chaos (and using that chaos to create yet another supranational structure), I don't see how they benefit.

...That said, if the NWO can create enough financial chaos and suffering NOW, they might not have to worry. According to the article above, the vote isn't binding. In other words, they've still got plenty of time to "persuade" the politicians (and the public) to reconsider.

======================================================

PLEASE forward this newsletter to anyone you think might be interested. Those who'd like to be added to our news list can sign up at: http://stopthelie.com/stl_newsletter.html

Other sources for alternative news: 

https://www.corbettreport.com/
http://www.PrisonPlanet.com/
http://www.FreedomsPhoenix.com/Front-Page.htm
http://needtoknow.news/ 



Previous Week's News 06-20-2016

State Department 'Diplomats' Demand War on Assad 
Source: RonPaulInstitute.org
In a move that the New York Times reports is nearly unprecedented, some 51 mid-level State Department employees have signed a letter calling for the Obama Administration to begin bombing the Assad government in Syria immediately. 

Demonstrating the reality that the "soft power" of diplomacy is in fact just a front for the "hard power" of bombs, these "diplomats" demanded the administration immediately initiate:

"[A] judicious use of stand-off and air weapons, which would undergird and drive a more focused and hard-nosed US-led diplomatic process."

Yes, to these supposed trained "diplomats," the "diplomatic process" consists of making final demands after the military has bombed your opponent to hell.
Read full article at: http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2016/june/17/state-department-diplomats-demand-war-on-assad-and-russia

======================================================

Do citizens (not police officers) with guns ever stop mass shootings?
Source: WashingtonPost.com
1. In Chicago earlier this year, an Uber driver with a concealed-carry permit "shot and wounded a gunman [Everardo Custodio] who opened fire on a crowd of people."

2. In a Philadelphia barber shop earlier this year, Warren Edwards "opened fire on customers and barbers" after an argument. Another man with a concealed-carry permit then shot the shooter; of course it's impossible to tell whether the shooter would have kept killing if he hadn't been stopped, but a police captain was quoted as saying that, "I guess he [the man who shot the shooter] saved a lot of people in there."

3. In a hospital near Philadelphia, in 2014, Richard Plotts shot and killed the psychiatric caseworker with whom he was meeting, and shot and wounded his psychiatrist, Lee Silverman. Silverman shot back, and took down Plotts. While again it's not certain whether Plotts would have killed other people, Delaware County D.A. Jack Whelan stated that, "If the doctor did not have a firearm, (and) the doctor did not utilize the firearm, he'd be dead today, and I believe that other people in that facility would also be dead"; Yeadon Police Chief Donald Molineux similar said that he "believe[d] the doctor saved lives." Plotts was still carrying 39 unspent rounds when he was arrested. 
Read full article at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/10/03/do-civilians-with-guns-ever-stop-mass-shootings/

======================================================

Build a Bug Out Kindle: A Digital Survival Library at Your Fingertips
Source: ArtOfManliness.com
--Here's the good news: survival knowledge weighs nothing.

This is true for those who practice and study survival and preparedness skills on a regular basis. But for those who don't, access to that survival knowledge only has to weigh about 1 pound – the weight of an Amazon Kindle. I'm not at all suggesting that the practice and study of survival skills should or can be replaced by ebooks. However, an entire survival library of information at your fingertips just may be the one survival tool in your Bug Out Bag that saves your life.
Read full article at: http://www.artofmanliness.com/2014/06/17/build-a-bug-out-kindle-a-digital-survival-library-at-your-fingertips/

======================================================

5 Reasons To Question The Official Story Of The Orlando Shooting
Source: ActivistPost.com
--Indeed, the FBI has had a long history in creating, organizing and facilitating terrorist attacks in order to bust them at the last minute and claim credit for stopping terror attacks. The FBI also has a long history of investigating, monitoring and interviewing suspects of high-profile terrorist attacks before those attacks were committed but doing nothing about them.

As Tony Cartalucci writes in his article, "US Law Enforcement Knew Florida Shooter BEFORE Shooting,"

'A terror suspect armed to the teeth storming a public place and killing scores is actually a very familiar script. The FBI wrote several such scripts in 2015 alone, including entrapping and arresting a mentally-ill suspect after providing him with an arsenal of deadly weapons almost identical to the arsenal recently employed in Florida.'

Interestingly enough, in the Ciccolo incident that Cartalucci refers to above, the plan which was fed to Ciccolo involved attacking bars, a target that was actually realized in Orlando. Of course, there will be many who will argue that the FBI, while entrapping unintelligent suspects, would never actually let the drill go live it is important to remember the 1993 World Trade Center bombing where that is precisely what the FBI did.
Read full article at: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/06/5-reasons-to-question-the-official-story-of-the-orlando-shooting.html?utm_source=Activist+Po

COMMENT: This is what it boils down to for me: 

Do the "intelligence services" have the ability to organize these types of psychological warfare operations? (Yes.) Have they done so in other countries? (Yes.) Were the operations effective; did they yield the desired political results? (Yes.) 

Take it a step further: Have the "intelligence services" conspired to use psychological warfare against the citizens and government of the United States? (Yes.) Do the intelligence services regularly "create" and then "disrupt" terror plots, under the guise of "conducting sting operations?" (Yes.) Does this provide them cover; essentially a blank check to cultivate terrorism? (Yes.) 

Now we're getting somewhere...In order to nudge politicians and the public in a certain direction, could the intelligence services periodically "drop the ball" on one of their manufactured terror plots? (Yes.) Would it be wise to consider this possibility; to look for FBI and CIA connections whenever a politically useful event occurs? (Yes.) Last but not least: Is there any logical reason NOT to suspect the intelligence services? (No.) 

"You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple…to force these people…to turn to the State to ask for greater security. This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the State cannot convict itself or declare itself responsible for what happened."—Vincenzo Vinciguerra, Gladio-linked terrorist

PLEASE forward this newsletter to anyone you think might be interested. Those who'd like to be added to our news list can sign up at: http://stopthelie.com/stl_newsletter.html

The Alex Jones Show - 26th June 2016

The Alex Jones Show - 26th June 2016

http://rss.infowars.com/20160626_Sun_Alex.mp3

Top Google trend: ‘is Hillary Clinton going to jail?’

Search engine users curious if Clinton crimes merit prison time. Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram