| FOREWORD FOR/TO ALL PEOPLE THAT WE ARE WORKING WITH PRIVATELY (OR NOT): It is imperative that you READ the contents of this email IN FULL. Over the coming weeks, get in touch with us in order to make arrangements to review the case(s) that you may be involved with, and more specifically wherein you may be involved with a "Civil Bill for Possession" in the Circuit Court. There is a distinct possibility that "your case" may fit the criteria laid out herein (below), wherein it may be a possible to force the said "Circuit Court" to strike "the/your case" out in its entirety. Circuit Courts may ultimately be issued with an edict to stop persecuting all "Civil Bill for Possession" cases, but to date that has not happened (in so far as we know). Equally this may also prove to be an important and key opportunity to stick a few more nails into the coffin ship of Banking as we know it. As a great many are now aware, we have been successfully having cases adjourned, delayed, struck out, and outright wins over the past years, and have made great strides recently in successfully "beating the banks", without ever attending Court. ALL of this is down to a thing called JURISDICTION, or the lack thereof of the Banks/Financial Institutions and/or the Court. Please read on … LAST THURSDAY MORNING (21st. May 2015); we got a call from a close friend of ours, asking if we would comment on the Appeal Case held in the High Court in relation to case no. 2014/88CA. At that particular point in time we did not have a copy of the Judgment of Ms. Justice Murphy. She obviously forgot to courier or email it over to us personally, what with her busy schedule and all (sic). We finally got a print copy of the said Judgement yesterday (Friday 22nd. May), and we are currently awaiting a copy of the order itself. It made and makes for a very interesting read from both a positive and negative perspective. BEFORE WE GET GOING, FOR THE RECORD: We are NOT claiming to have had any direct involvement in this case (unlike some others that will remain nameless). When we educate, inform and provide knowledge to People, what People do with that education, information and knowledge and how they use it, is entirely up to themselves. We are happy in these circumstances, that some of the material and information that we have been researching and sharing over the past years, seems on the face of it to be filtering through, and more and more People are beginning to tune in and challenge the lawful validity of all the Courts, and to say the least, their clandestine operation. THE KEY ISSUE in the case in a broad and specific sense is JURISDICTION. We will get into JURISDICTION further along in this article. For the moment we quote the closing paragraph (paragraph 37.) of Ms. Justice Murphy's Judgment as follows: "For the foregoing reasons the Court will allow the defendants' appeal on jurisdiction. In doing so, the Court observes that the defendants' success on this aspect of the case is a pyrrhic victory. In circumstances where there is no dispute that the defendants borrowed the money and no dispute that they ceased making the agreed repayments in August 2011, this judgment merely postpones the day of reckoning while their debt keeps mounting. So be it." In summary; this translates that the earlier Civil Bill for Possession that the "Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank" got from the Circuit Court is set aside ex debito justitiae (as a matter of right), on the grounds/basis that the Bank should not have been before the Circuit Court seeking a Possession Order of a home, and NO BANK can seek a "Civil Bill for Possession" of any Man or Woman's home in the Circuit Court. It does NOT have JURISDICTION to do so. JURISDICTION specifically in this case, was a matter that the Bank should not have been before the Court as the home in question was and is not rateable, because the Home was/is NOT a commercial property. The Bank and its legal representative Godfrey Hogan of Woods Hogan Solicitors had manipulated the facts in the Circuit Court, and what's more the Judge of the Circuit Court had ignored the facts, the truth and the law in relation to same. In her ruling/judgement Ms. Justice Murphy WILFULLY failed, refused and/or neglected to address the fact that "Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank" and their legal agent Godfrey Hogan of Woods Hogan Solicitors had and did bring FRAUD and PERJURY before the Circuit Court, and had and did bring the Court into disrepute. Despite this welcome ruling, the same Ms. Justice Murphy has nonetheless polished the knob of the Bank, in preparing the way forward for them to go again for repossession albeit under a new case, wherein she has stated that the "defendants' success … is a pyrrhic victory", in other words she has told the Bank to go again to the High Court, where in all likelihood they will be successful. According to Ms. Justice Murphy "there is NO DISPUTE that the DEFENDANTS BORROWED THE MONEY and NO DISPUTE that they CEASED MAKING AGREED REPAYMENTS in August 2011, THIS JUDGMENT MERELY POSTPONES THE DAY OF RECKONING WHILE THEIR DEBT KEEP MOUNTING". This is quite an appallingly shocking statement for a purported High Court Judge to make. This is a statement that we must all read and re-read again and again and again. Do not forget that this statement is set out in a JUDGEMENT of a Judge from the High Court. Thus, now this statement can be relied upon in the next, and/or any High Court Case that follows. Ms. Justice Murphy is giving, and has given evidence on behalf of the plaintiff, and against the defendant. Ms. Justice Murphy HAS AND IS ASSISTING THE BANK(S). This STATEMENT can now be relied upon next time round by the Bank, as part of their pleadings. As per the Judgement of Ms. Justice Murphy, case no. 2014/88CA – 20th. May 2015, wherein Ms. Justice Murphy has already ruled that: 1.There is NO DISPUTE the DEFENDANTS BORROWED THE MONEY. 2.Theres NO DISPUTE they CEASED MAKING AGREED REPAYMENTS. 3. THEIR DEBT KEEPS MOUNTING. Wouldn't you be an absolute tool, if you did not use this in the High Court against the Defendants next time? The case is now potentially a pretty open and shut for the Bank, next time out of the traps … or so it would seem. Of course the Bank per say still have to go through the technicality of lodging a new case, serving a summons and statement of claim, issuing affidavits etc. But they now have a potential added benefit of relying upon the evidence contained within the ruling judgement of Ms. Justice Murphy, wherein she (as the cats pyjamas) has testified to all of the above. On the face of it, its looks like the ruling judgement is in favour of the Defendants, but in the wider and broader sense it may not be. ON A MORE POSITIVE NOTE: This ruling does mean that any Man or Woman that was, is or may currently be before the Circuit Court in relation to "Civil Bill(s) for Possession" of their home(s), may now seek to have existing (past) Judgements vacated/overturned etc., and have current cases struck out in their entirety, on the basis that the said Circuit Court have no, and have not ever had JURISDICTION for the said cases to be before the Court. Equally ALL Defendants that may have Judgements vacated/overturned, and/or current cases struck out, are entitled to Costs and/or Damages, on the basis of the said Circuit Court having NO JURISDICTION for the cases to have been before the Court. That may also mean that the said Bank/Financial Institution may have to reverse a great many sales, and/or return People's homes, and/or pay vast sums in compensation etc. The mind boggles as to how much damage this may do to the Banks/Financial Institutions and to the Courts. On another note, the said Banks/Financial Institutions Legal Counsel, the Court Clerks, Officer and Employees of the Court, Registrars and Judges involved have illegally and unlawfully facilitated and aided and abetted the said Banks/Financial Institutions in lodging and bringing before the Courts, cases that were and are not authentic, and are illegal and unlawful. A few weeks back, we penned an article on similar matters. It will be well worth your will reviewing/reading this material again, especially if you plan on challenging the Circuit Courts Jurisdiction. the link for which is here: http://www.icontact-archive.com/6FnIU6Xpr7AsrExo_nHTm7mM2evf-ag-?w=3 YOU WILL NOTE and NOTICE: The distinct lack of reporting in the populist media about this case. Over the past week, referendums and by-elections have taken centre stage. Again, we would encourage ALL of our readers and contacts to share the work and emails we put out. It may not help you today, but it may help your friend or neighbour, and it will give you a deeper knowledge and understanding of what is really going on, that the populist media will not. THAT IS ALL FOR NOW FOLKS. WE WILL FOLLOW THESE MATTERS UP WITH YOU ALL ASAP. | 
No comments:
Post a Comment