DO YOU THINK; YOU CAN YOU ANSWER THIS QUESTION?: What defensive weapon is it, the State do not wish or want to you have knowledge of or access to, or the ability to use or wield? ANSWER: The State do not want or wish me to have the ability to _ _ _ for myself. We would like to think, that you would think deeply about this question, and when you think you know the answer (and there is only one), send us on a quick email, confirming that you think you have the answer, and what you think it is. As the saying goes; "ignorance is the weapon of mass destruction". An ability to think for ones-self is an ability that not everyone possesses. Ignorance is what the State rely upon to keep People in toe. If you are in-toe with the State, you may perhaps perceive that you are, what they say you are … which is a, Citizen of the State. If you are a "Citizen of the State", then you may be interested in who/m is in politics, who/m the party of the day are, or might be. Who/m might be able to take the place of the current government; that might get us our rights, and/or truly represent our interests as Citizens of the State. You may as a "Citizen of the State" be interested in voting in, or voting out the local, regional and/or national representatives. In voting for change and/or voting for reform etc. In a nutshell, by being a "Citizen of the State", you are handing over the responsibility and/or authority that you already wield and/or possess as a People, (albeit the word People is both singular and plural), to the politicians. To be clear and unambiguous, ALL Politicians that are Council members, TD's, MEP's etc., are controlled in no uncertain terms, and are subsumed by the State. Some of them will jump up and down once in a while and some will give out and call for others to resign etc., stating things like "he/you must go", "your position is untenable" or "you're a disgrace to the office/position etc.". In the mean-time, while those that presume to represent you, complain, moan, blame and berate each-other, you as a "Citizen of the State" will still get rode and financially raped. Every once in a while a "Yes Man" or "Yes Woman" will appear. They will say ALL the right things, and make all the right promises. They will outwardly be seen to take all the right steps. They will appear at the right time, at the right rallies, the right protests. They will say the right thing, and perceivably do the right thing, and many will listen to them and applaud their words and sometimes their actions. Eventually most, if not all these "Yes People", will announce, that in order to affect and/or make change, you can only do it from the inside, and from a "Political Platform", and so they run for local/area/national elections etc. In recent months and years we have seen a plethora of "Yes People" appear for brief periods of time, only to be subsumed by Politics and the State. What constructive or progressive change has this affected? --- NONE! What impact had it upon their alleged supporters? --- It has pacified most! What has it done to the People who were rallying in solidarity? --- It has divided and splintered them! The State need the "Yes Men" and the "Yes Women", that will go out and rally People under one campaign, one cause or one umbrella. The State need the "Yes Men" and the "Yes Women" that perceive of themselves as being leaders of the People, leaders of the Cause, heads of the Campaign, holders of the Umbrella. In that way the People do not have to THINK for, or act for and on behalf of themselves. They will become pacified as they look to and under leadership. They will be become divided and splintered under differing and different causes. Then the State can, will and do subsume these "Yes Men" and "Yes Women" … "the leaders" into Politics and the State, where they can be controlled and whipped into shape. While there are still these "Yes Wo/Men" and you follow them, you will not have to think for yourself and/or act for yourself, as they will be doing the thinking and acting for you. In the end, you will not have clarity of thought, and you will not have solidarity amongst People. You will end up with what we currently have, passive, splintered and divided sets of "Citizens of the State", that look to the "Yes Wo/Men" for the answers and the leadership, that are subsumed by the State, and will never-ever seek or look to divest themselves of the State. Same-old, same-old. This article might seem a little on the pejorative side, bet perhaps it might start some People to think? All the best for now; Des: of The Common Law Society |
Facebook
Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment