| TOTALLY MENTAL REVENUE We got an interesting email a couple of weeks back. We will call the writer of the said email John (This is not Joes real name). John said, he was very interested in doing/attending the upcoming Income Tax (Criminal Law) School. John also said that he had not made an Income Tax Declaration in the past two or three years, and had no intention of doing so in the future … More to the point, John hoped that the upcoming School, would help him grasp and understand the Income Tax game in greater depth (or words to that effect). That was all grand … A few days later, John wrote again. This time John was a little less upbeat. John more or less said … "not making an Income Tax Declaration was all well and good, but how am I supposed to get "MY" Tax Clearance Certificate now?" … John went on to say, he "needed a Tax Clearance Certificate" as he "was self-employed", and if he didn't have it, he "would not be able to work". Whilst we have every sympathy for his plight, isn't John looking for Jam on both sides of his bread? On one hand John wanted "out of the Income Tax System" … which meant NOT making a Declaration and/or making Returns. On the other hand John wants to keep or maintain the BENEFIT of having and getting a Tax Clearance Certificate from Revenue/the State, in order to be self-employed. On the FRONT Page of The Common Law Society web site, there stands the immortal words: "He who receives the Benefit should also bear the disadvantage." There is no translation required here … but for the sake of clarity in John's case: John … if you want to have the BENEFIT of getting and using a Tax Clearance Certificate, then on balance of that, you bear the disadvantage of making the said declaration and/or returns accordingly. Equally if John wants the BENEFIT of NOT being within the Revenue/State Taxation system, he will have to give up on getting a Tax Clearance Certificate. All of this makes perfect sense: You are either a member of the Club called Revenue/the State, or you are not. With said membership, you get all the BENEFITS and all the LIABILITIES attached to being a member. It really is up to you to decide. Obviously the Club "Management" don't like it when members leave, and will do EVERYTHING within their perceived power or perceived authority to stop your exit, and/or to bring you back into the club. Sometimes the "EVERYTHING" gets very nasty: It can consist of writing letters of a demanding and threatening nature, writing to and calling others about you, calling out to visit you, texting, calling you and/or emailing you, taking civil or criminal actions, and threatening to steal stuff they think you might own, be it from bank accounts, wages etc. and/or physical goods, and printing nasty stuff in the paper about you. There is no end to their depravity … they are totally mental (as they say). As far as we know: Revenue have never murdered anyone directly. Although they may have been complicit and/or psychologically pushed and/or abused People to the point where they have committed suicide, or perhaps assisted in their suicide. Perhaps this could be coined as the new meaning and understanding of the term "Assisted Suicide"? … as in; "Revenue have a score of 10 Assisted Suicides for the first quarter of this year, and hope to increase this figure by 10% for their next quarter year on year figure". Perhaps this could go out in their staff quarterly report/newsletter, as one of their scorecards for their Key Performance Indicators (KPI's)? Perhaps their agents/staff could be put on KPI Bonuses, to incentivise them to get achieve better results on their "Assisted Suicide" score-card? Yes … this all sounds a little contrived and over dramatic, but it is like this when you come face to face with Revenue on certain issues. They do FACTUALLY employ ALL of the above techniques acts/actions as described above (and more), when and/or if you have the temerity to challenge their perceived authority. We are not pulling our punches on this, so be prepared to go to war with Revenue and "the State" if you are going to step out of or away from their club, which of course you are LAWFULLY ENTITLED TO DO. FINALLY JOHN: DO NOT EXPECT TO HAVE JAM ON BOTH SIDES OF YOUR BREAD!!! ~~~ On The CLS Talks ... Lionel and Des get slightly sidetracked into Revenue and other stuff … it makes for very interesting listening. Please feel free to share this email and all the links with your friends. The latest "The CLS Talks" can be found >HERE< The next School of Commonology is on "Income Tax Criminal Law": More information and booking details can be found here: www.itcl.eventbrite.com/ | 
No comments:
Post a Comment