Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

---

• Wealthy Flee France Top Tax Rate of 75%; Cameron Lays Out Red Carpet
• Medicine is Killing the Patient; Increasing the Dose is Madness
• What Role Does Government Play in Price Inflation? Various Charts Provide the Answer!

Wealthy Flee France Top Tax Rate of 75%; Cameron Lays Out Red Carpet Posted: 17 Jul 2012 05:25 PM PDT The higher the tax rate, the greater the length people will go to avoid it. France is a case in point. An 'Exodus' of Wealthy is underway even before French parliament has passed Hollande's proposed top tax rate of 75%. The latest estate agency figures have shown large numbers of France's most well-heeled families selling up and moving to neighbouring countries. Many are fleeing a proposed new higher tax rate of 75 per cent on all earnings over one million euros. (£780,000) The previous top tax bracket of 41 per cent on earnings over 72,000 euros is also set to increase to 45 per cent. Sotheby's Realty, the estate agent arm of the British auction house, said its French offices sold more than 100 properties over 1.7 million euros between April and June this year - a marked increase on the same period in 2011. Alexander Kraft, head of Sotheby's Realty, France, said: "The result of the presidential election has had a real impact on our sales. "Now a large number of wealthy French families are leaving the country as a direct result of the proposals of the new government. Gilles Martin, a Swiss tax consultant, reported the same trend. "Since the socialists came to power in France, I have been deluged with inquiries from rich French people who would rather pay their tax in Switzerland," he told Switzerland's 20 Minutes newspaper. A report earlier this year by London estate agents also showed France's richest people were heading to Britain to escape new higher taxes. Prime minister David Cameron angered the French last month when he said he would "roll out the red carpet" to wealthy French citizens and firms who wanted move out and pay their taxes in Britain. "If the French go ahead with a 75 per cent top rate of tax we will roll out the red carpet and welcome more French businesses to Britain and they can pay tax in Britain and pay for our health service and schools and everything else." So what's Hollande to do? Make it a crime to move for purposes of tax avoidance? Tax people for moving? Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

Medicine is Killing the Patient; Increasing the Dose is Madness Posted: 17 Jul 2012 03:36 PM PDT Nigel Farage is once again making common sense arguments in European parliament while blasting the absence of European commission president Herman Van Rompuy and EC commissioner José Manuel Barroso, noting the medicine is killing the patient. Select Quotes The medicine is killing the patient. Increasing the dose is madness. Greece outside the Eurozone may well provide an inspiration for Spain, Portugal, and many other countries. We need to recognize that a terrible mistake has been made. We've got to break up the euro We've got to restore democracy We've got to restore human dignity We must ignore Barroso and Van Rumpoy. We must provide people with hope I agree with Farage on all points. Indeed, I believe any clear-thinking person would see that he is correct on all points. The only reason the eurozone has not broken apart already is politicians, especially German chancellor Angela Merkel, have made career commitments to the Euro. Merkel in particular would sell her soul to save it. It may come to that, and if so she will fail anyway. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

What Role Does Government Play in Price Inflation? Various Charts Provide the Answer! Posted: 17 Jul 2012 08:04 AM PDT Let's take a look at inflation from the standpoint of prices. That viewpoint puts the cart before the horse (my definition of inflation pertains to an increase or decrease in money supply and credit, not an increase in prices). Nonetheless the results are significant. Inflation Comparison - Select Components Since 1978 Inflation Comparison - Current CPI Components Since 2000 Discussion of Starting Year The above charts are from Doug Short at Advisor Perspectives. Doug creates excellent charts every month on various CPI components. Rather than reinvent the wheel, I asked Doug for a set of custom charts. Specifically, I had asked Doug to go back to 1971 for both charts. Unfortunately, data for components in the first chart only goes back to 1978, and in the second chart not even that far. The reason I asked for a starting year of  1971 is that's when I started college. Tuition at the University of Illinois in Fall of 1971 was $250 a semester for engineers (My degree is in civil engineering). Current University of Illinois Tuition is $8,278 per semester for Illinois residents, $15,349 for non-residents. Note that tuition difference: $250 in 1971 vs. $8,278 today.  Note Areas of Highest and Lowest Price Inflation The least government interference is in apparel and recreation. The most government interference in the free market is education and health care. Education is rife with "no child left behind" madness, student loans, and free tuition for veterans. Moreover, the influence of public unions in raising taxes to support teachers and administrators (not the kids) is staggering. Medicare and Medicaid are behind soaring medical costs. Energy is  up because of peak oil. It is also up because the US military is one of the largest consumers of petroleum products. Productivity improvements in food are nothing short of amazing. Had the drought we are experiencing now  occurred 12 years ago, corn production would likely have been hammered in this heat wave. Nonetheless, government crop subsidies and preposterous ethanol regulations have pushed up the price of corn. In turn, corn prices filter through to cattle fattening operations, cereals, and high-fructose corn syrup which unfortunately is a product everywhere you look. Note that in the eight components of the core CPI (second chart), that education and communication are listed together. The rationale for that grouping escapes me.  Also note that the cost of a new car (first chart) since 1978 is the lowest in that grouping. Please reflect why: Other than safety regulations and mileage requirements, government interferes little in the auto segment (ignoring the recent GM bailout). Car prices are of course hedonically adjusted. Then again, today's cars are far better than any car you could get in 1978. Housing costs (second chart) are reflective of Owners' Equivalent Rent, not actual housing prices, so that component does not reflect reality at all. In short, prices are up in areas with the most government interference and the least in areas of the least government interference (apparel, autos, recreation, communication). Housing Prices Housing certainly merits a discussion. However, as noted above, the housing component in the CPI is a measure of rental prices not home prices. Here is a chart from How Far Have Home Prices "Really" Fallen? HPI and the CPI HPI Nominal Price, PCE Adjusted, and CPI Adjusted click on any chart for sharper image Home prices soared along with hundreds  of  government "affordable housing" initiatives. Well home prices are now affordable in many areas but Bernanke, banks, and government officials are extremely distressed over this unwelcome news.    No one but consumers really wanted "affordable housing" they just wanted to claim they did. Heck, even consumers do not want affordable homes once they buy. Politics of Low Prices Mitt Romney is not satisfied with low prices of autos or apparel. Nor is president Obama. Nor is the Fed. Romney has even declared he would label China a currency manipulator if elected. Romney desperately needs to study history, specifically the results of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act that compounded problems during the Great Depression. Consumers like and want low prices (with the exception of home prices after they buy). Who doesn't want a bargain?  The answer is Romney, Obama, the Fed and unions. All of them want to rob you blind in misguided belief that high prices are better than low prices.  It's a mad, mad, bureaucratic world where cheap, plentiful goods are considered a problem. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.