Monday, 19 October 2015

can ye get this message to others


Hi Folks ...

 

Can ye get this message to "water protestors" ???

 

We got a call last week from a lady that was or is involved (in some way), with the People that have been issued with Summons for alleged "Obstruction" in relation to the water protests. At the time she called we just couldn't manage to speak to her, and asked her to call us back again, after lunch. For whatever reason, we have not heard from her again.

 

If she and her friends are reading this, then what we would say and suggest; is that if the alleged "protestors" have "Legal Representation" on board, in order for the alleged protesters to give what they are doing some mileage, then it may be a good idea to off-load the "Legal Representation" i.e. take the said "Legal Representation" off record/sack them, and go it alone, and to legally represent themselves.

 

"The State" will not like or take kindly to this move.

 

After all, if you are going to "Protest", then why not go the whole hog, and go with the power of your convictions. The next moves are simple, and will cause "the State" no end of a headache, in terms of time and cost, with the potential for an outright win, or for the matter to end up in the European Courts.

 

Perhaps you/ye are already aware of this; the matter is a CRIMINAL case. "The State" are charging you/ye with alleged Criminal Offences, albeit they are perceived as Minor Criminal Offences.

 

The next Step would be to print off, read and share the following article:

http://www.thecommonlawsociety.com/must_see/WhatYouDontKnow.pdf

 

Plus the material covered in DPP Guidelines for Prosecutors, specifically sections 8 and 9:

https://www.dppireland.ie/filestore/documents/GUIDELINES_-_Revised_NOV_2010_eng.pdf

 

 

Because the matter is CRIMINAL; you/ye are LAWFULLY entitled to FULL DISCLOSURE of ALL the EVIDENCE that the prosecution are relying upon (on an ongoing basis). Perhaps after reading the article, you/ye should consider seeking a "Gary Doyle Order" from the Court, when you/ye are before it next?  The/your case cannot LAWFULLY proceed until FULL DISCLOSURE is given.

 

As a further follow up, you will be LAWFULLY entitled to CROSS-EXAMINE all that are involved with the matter, this may extend to the said Joan Burton and/or Enda Kenny etc. The prosecution (The DPP/Garda Siochana/Minister for Justice), will have to produce Witnesses and Witness Statements, and can only base their case on specifically identifying a "PARTICULAR VICTIM", whom you now have the LAWFUL right to Cross-Examine in open and Public Court (Wouldn't that be FUN?).

 

TAKE NOTE: You cannot be forced to make a pleading or enter any defense (EVER), until such time as you have been given FULL DISCLOSURE of ALL EVIDENCE that the prosecution rely upon. The BURDEN OF PROOF in LAW is always with/on the accuser/prosecution.

 

We hope this information is of use, and we would appreciate that if any of our readers/contacts have access to and/or know the said accused People, that you/ye will get this information to them. It will mess up "the State" and the prosecutor no end, and will leave an indelible mark on the kangaroo court system.

 

It will also mean that you/your protest has not come to an abrupt end … that it is only just beginning.

 

All the best,

The CLS.

 

 

GET ON OUR MAILING LIST HERE:

www.TheCommonLawSociety.com/





No comments:

Post a Comment