| Some of Our Views Shared: Sometimes we are asked to comment on particular Criminal Cases that are viewed as serious in nature. For and the record, we do not engage with and/or condone any Serious Criminal acts, behaviors or activities, and we think that all Men and Women should treat each other with respect, dignity and/or without ill will. IDENTIFY THE CRIME and the VICTIM:
In order to help us and perhaps our friends, readers and listeners clearly identify when "a crime" per say is serious, there is a default position, that not only we have and hold, but that, believe it or not "the State" and all their cohorts by LAW have and can be held to … That is to say; where a purported "Serious or Minor Crime" has taken place, there has to be what is called and termed by the Department of Public Prosecutions (DPP) guidelines for public prosecutors, a/the "PARTICULAR VICTIM". If there is NO "PARTICULAR VICTIM" there is NO CRIME. Where NO "PARTICULAR VICTIM" can be identified and/or produced, NO CRIME (unless consented to), can be prosecuted. More often than not, when People are being prosecuted (persecuted) for alleged offences by say An Garda Siochana, the Revenue/Customs Commissioner, the County Council and any other "State/Semi-State" bodies, if you ask them WHO the "PARTICULAR VICTIM" is alleged to be, they will argue that "the State" is the "PARTICULAR VICTIM". So can the Prosecution produce "the State"? Can "the State" act as a witness? Can "the State" be deposed and/or cross-examined? "The State" in LAW and in legal precedence is defined as a "Juristic Person", and as such can be sued. A "Juristic Person" is what is termed or called a "Legal Fiction". Yes "the State" is a FICTION. It is recognised for the sole purpose of holding "the State" accountable in LAW. In other words, when the People that represent "the State", do something wrong, then the recognition of "the State" as a "Juristic Person" in LAW, gives you the LAWFUL right to sue "the State", as a way of holding "the State" accountable. Now, "the State" will and have argued that they represent "the People of Ireland", and therefore will allege, allude or infer that by not complying with "the States" LAWS, that you have committed a crime against "the People of Ireland". Therefore, surely if that is the case, or their case, can they (the State), produce the PARTICULAR PEOPLE of Ireland, that can and will give testimony and/or witness to these alleged crimes, and that have FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of the said alleged crime or crimes? That is the Trillion Euro question. So far, with ALL Minor Criminal Cases we have worked on with People, "the State" have totally evaded, avoided, failed, refused and/or neglected to address this question. Further to that, NONE of the PARTICULAR PEOPLE we worked with have been successfully prosecuted/persecuted by "the State" or any "Semi-State" body. This question, when framed and asked in a certain way, seems to thrown them (the State) off their game entirely. Who is the PARTICULAR VICTIM? If there is a CRIME, there MUST be a VICTIM. Who is the PARTICULAR VICTIM? Can "the State" produce a body, albeit one that is dead or alive? From the body of a/any PARTICULAR VICTIM will come the evidence and/or a statement of evidence. If "the State" do not have a PARTICULAR VICTIM, they will have no physical body to give or state evidence. There will be no "body of/to evidence". If there is no "body of/to evidence" there is NO CASE, and NO GROUNDS for a case. This basic idea, concept, tenant of LAW applies to ALL MINOR ALLEGED CRIMINAL OFFENCES, as well as ALL ALLEGED SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCES. "The State" cannot physically produce a "body of/to evidence" in MINOR ALLEGED CRIMINAL OFFENCES, because NOBODY has been physically harmed, injured or damaged. Therefore "the State" cannot produce a PARTICULAR VICTIM, because there is NO VICTIM, and therefore there is NO CASE, unless of course you acquiesce, concede and/or consent to being prosecuted, or give evidence against yourself. In most cases (usually the ones we are not a party to), People on the whole tend to give evidence against themselves, because they FEAR "the State". We have explained the F.E.A.R. thing before: F.E.A.R. stands for False Evidence Appearing Real. The so called "Evidence" that "the State" will lay before you and/or the Court is FALSE, but it APPEARS to be REAL, because of the way they present it, and the way you react to it. What happens to you before, during and after one of their Court cases, is wholly determined by your own outlook, and then by your reactions or non-reaction. If you do not know how to Critically Think about their "False Evidence Appearing Real", then you do not stand a chance. If however you read and listen to the materials that The Common Law Society put out, it will certainly lessen the f.e.a.r., and you may be able to get to a point, where in the least, you are NOT giving EVIDENCE AGAINST YOURSELF, which is a very good starting block. THIS IS IMPORTANT: Obviously read and re-read this article along with other stuff, and share it with as many People as possible. Then discuss, debate and argue it amongst your friends and family. They won't always agree with your point of view, but in disagreeing with you, they may be unwittingly helping you to fine tune your Critical Thinking skills, and perhaps you may be opening their eyes also? Thanks for reading and sharing, The Common Law Society. ~~~ The Final School of Commonology for 2015 is on Mon. 7th. Dec. 2015. Book your place(s) here: www.CourtRoomDrama.eventbrite.com/ THIS IS VITALLY IMPORTANT TO SHARE: We would like all our readers to share this with your friends, family, neighbors, community, acquaintances, and on all or any social media platforms that you/ye may have access to. Please do not change, edit, correct, add or amend any parts of this email message. Get on our mailing list here: www.TheCommonLawSociety.com/ E: info@thecommonlawsociety.com LL: 057 8688 410 | 
No comments:
Post a Comment